Physical attractiveness and dating choice suridating com


Instead, participants were randomly paired, except no man was paired with a taller woman.

During an intermission of the dance, participants were asked to assess their date.

Huston attempted to prove this by showing participants photos of people who had already indicated that they would accept the participant as a partner.The findings were as follows: (a) subjects selected a more physically attractive female when assured of acceptance than when acceptance was left ambiguous; (b) subjects estimated that highly physically attractive females were less likely to accept them as a date than were either moderately physically attractive or physically unattractive females; (c) subjects' self-ratings of their likableness were not related to the physical attractiveness of their choices under either choice condition nor to their estimates of their chances that the females would accept them as a date; and (d) subjects' self-evaluated physical attractiveness, although unrelated to the physical attractiveness of the subjects' choices, did relate to subjects' estimates of their chances of acceptance.Highly physically attractive subjects estimated their chances of acceptance as better than did subjects who considered themselves low in physical attractiveness.It was also found that both men and women were more satisfied with their dates if their dates had high levels of attractiveness.Physical attractiveness was found to be the most important factor in enjoying the date and whether or not they would sleep with them when propositioned.The study also supported that some, especially men, view relationships as a marketplace.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!